|
| [Note Guidelines] Photographer's Note |
I am back today to propose you a picture I have been thinking posting for a while but hesitated. I like it but there is something, a little I don't know that keeps me from liking it a lot.
It is a reflection on a small pond found beside a river. I really like the pine and the birches being reflected without seeing them. I like the multitude of grasses and herbs around the pond, the illuminated rocks, all in a chaos like nature is most of the time.
Chaos and fractals. What you see at a small scale if found at a larger scale, identifical. As below as above. Fractals seem to be the manifestation of organized chaos. Maybe I am loosing some of you as I am loosing myself here a little bit.
This part of physics, the Chaos Theory and the like, is almost metaphysical. A fractal is a geometric shape repeating the same pattern over and over, found at different scales.
Nature is supposedly shaped a lot by fractals. You find it in clouds, snow flakes, mountains, the shores of water bodies, blood vessels. Anything that starts from the smallest and ends in biggest.
It's the phenomenon one sees when looking at a river in a picture shot from space. You see all the meanders and smallest branches falling into the biggest and ending in the ocean. It looks similar to a tree branch or our pulmonary vessels.
I have read that if you look from above at a coastline, then get closer, you will find the same pattern. Some scientists even went as far as proposing that if a part of the coastline is changed, let's say by a tourist picking up some rocks on the shore, the biggest pattern at a larger scale is also affected in the same way: change the pattern at a small scale and the bigger scale is changing as well. So they proposed, in order to rebuild parts of coastlines that are destroyed, to repair damages in repairing it a smaller scale: you can influence a landscape by changing it a a small scale. The bigger scale will reflect the changes. Wow.
I read that they did some experiment with corals in the ocean that were destroyed by pollution. It is kind of incredible and I don't know if they pursued such researches. Maybe some of you know about it.
There is also some computer programs generating images of large scale landscape based on fractals. I know that such programs have been used to create the mountains in Star Wars and they use it a lot in graphic arts and movies.
Anyway, to me this picture is very "fractal" with all the entertwined twigs, the reflection, the rocks and the limits of the pond. That's what I like most about it.
Hope you enjoy! I am late commenting your pictures, I wasn't feeling too well. I will be back this evening! Thank you,
Francine
shot in jpeg, resized for TN
ISO 400 at 17mm.
FRACTALS by Wikipedia
A fractal is generally "a rough or fragmented geometric shape that can be subdivided into parts, each of which is (at least approximately) a reduced-size copy of the whole,"[1] a property called self-similarity. The term was coined by Benoît Mandelbrot in 1975 and was derived from the Latin fractus meaning "broken" or "fractured."
A fractal often has the following features:
* It has a fine structure at arbitrarily small scales.
* It is too irregular to be easily described in traditional Euclidean geometric language.
* It is self-similar (at least approximately or stochastically).
* It has a Hausdorff dimension which is greater than its topological dimension (although this requirement is not met by space-filling curves such as the Hilbert curve).
* It has a simple and recursive definition.[2]
Because they appear similar at all levels of magnification, fractals are often considered to be infinitely complex (in informal terms). Natural objects that approximate fractals to a degree include clouds, mountain ranges, lightning bolts, coastlines, and snow flakes. However, not all self-similar objects are fractals—for example, the real line (a straight Euclidean line) is formally self-similar but fails to have other fractal characteristics.
Contents
* 1 History
* 2 Examples
* 3 Generating fractals
* 4 Classification
* 5 In nature
* 6 In creative works
* 7 Applications
* 8 See also
* 9 References
* 10 Further reading
* 11 External links
History
To create a Koch snowflake, start with an equilateral triangle and replace the middle third of every line segment with a pair of line segments that form an equilateral "bump." Then perform the same replacement on every line segment of the resulting shape, ad infinitum. With every iteration, the perimeter of this shape grows by 1/3rd. The Koch snowflake is the result of an infinite number of these iterations, and has an infinite length, while its area remains finite. For this reason, the Koch snowflake and similar constructions were sometimes called "monster curves."
To create a Koch snowflake, start with an equilateral triangle and replace the middle third of every line segment with a pair of line segments that form an equilateral "bump." Then perform the same replacement on every line segment of the resulting shape, ad infinitum. With every iteration, the perimeter of this shape grows by 1/3rd. The Koch snowflake is the result of an infinite number of these iterations, and has an infinite length, while its area remains finite. For this reason, the Koch snowflake and similar constructions were sometimes called "monster curves."
The mathematics behind fractals began to take shape in the 17th century when philosopher Leibniz considered recursive self-similarity (although he made the mistake of thinking that only the straight line was self-similar in this sense).
It took until 1872 before a function appeared whose graph would today be considered fractal, when Karl Weierstrass gave an example of a function with the non-intuitive property of being everywhere continuous but nowhere differentiable. In 1904, Helge von Koch, dissatisfied with Weierstrass's very abstract and analytic definition, gave a more geometric definition of a similar function, which is now called the Koch snowflake. In 1915, Waclaw Sierpinski constructed his triangle and, one year later, his carpet. Originally these geometric fractals were described as curves rather than the 2D shapes that they are known as in their modern constructions. The idea of self-similar curves was taken further by Paul Pierre Lévy, who, in his 1938 paper Plane or Space Curves and Surfaces Consisting of Parts Similar to the Whole described a new fractal curve, the Lévy C curve.
Georg Cantor also gave examples of subsets of the real line with unusual properties—these Cantor sets are also now recognized as fractals.
Iterated functions in the complex plane were investigated in the late 19th and early 20th centuries by Henri Poincaré, Felix Klein, Pierre Fatou and Gaston Julia. However, without the aid of modern computer graphics, they lacked the means to visualize the beauty of many of the objects that they had discovered.
In the 1960s, Benoît Mandelbrot started investigating self-similarity in papers such as How Long Is the Coast of Britain? Statistical Self-Similarity and Fractional Dimension, which built on earlier work by Lewis Fry Richardson. Finally, in 1975 Mandelbrot coined the word "fractal" to denote an object whose Hausdorff-Besicovitch dimension is greater than its topological dimension. He illustrated this mathematical definition with striking computer-constructed visualizations. These images captured the popular imagination; many of them were based on recursion, leading to the popular meaning of the term "fractal".
A relatively simple class of examples is given by the Cantor sets, Sierpinski triangle and carpet, Menger sponge, dragon curve, space-filling curve, and Koch curve. Additional examples of fractals include the Lyapunov fractal and the limit sets of Kleinian groups. Fractals can be deterministic (all the above) or stochastic (that is, non-deterministic). For example, the trajectories of the Brownian motion in the plane have a Hausdorff dimension of 2.
Chaotic dynamical systems are sometimes associated with fractals. Objects in the phase space of a dynamical system can be fractals (see attractor). Objects in the parameter space for a family of systems may be fractal as well. An interesting example is the Mandelbrot set. This set contains whole discs, so it has a Hausdorff dimension equal to its topological dimension of 2—but what is truly surprising is that the boundary of the Mandelbrot set also has a Hausdorff dimension of 2 (while the topological dimension of 1), a result proved by Mitsuhiro Shishikura in 1991. A closely related fractal is the Julia set.
Even simple smooth curves can exhibit the fractal property of self-similarity. For example the power-law curve (also known as a Pareto distribution) produces similar shapes at various magnifications.
Generating fractals
Three common techniques for generating fractals are:
* Escape-time fractals — These are defined by a recurrence relation at each point in a space (such as the complex plane). Examples of this type are the Mandelbrot set, Julia set, the Burning Ship fractal and the Lyapunov fractal.
* Iterated function systems — These have a fixed geometric replacement rule. Cantor set, Sierpinski carpet, Sierpinski gasket, Peano curve, Koch snowflake, Harter-Heighway dragon curve, T-Square, Menger sponge, are some examples of such fractals.
* Random fractals — Generated by stochastic rather than deterministic processes, for example, trajectories of the Brownian motion, Lévy flight, fractal landscapes and the Brownian tree. The latter yields so-called mass- or dendritic fractals, for example, diffusion-limited aggregation or reaction-limited aggregation clusters.
Classification
Fractals can also be classified according to their self-similarity. There are three types of self-similarity found in fractals:
* Exact self-similarity — This is the strongest type of self-similarity; the fractal appears identical at different scales. Fractals defined by iterated function systems often display exact self-similarity.
* Quasi-self-similarity — This is a loose form of self-similarity; the fractal appears approximately (but not exactly) identical at different scales. Quasi-self-similar fractals contain small copies of the entire fractal in distorted and degenerate forms. Fractals defined by recurrence relations are usually quasi-self-similar but not exactly self-similar.
* Statistical self-similarity — This is the weakest type of self-similarity; the fractal has numerical or statistical measures which are preserved across scales. Most reasonable definitions of "fractal" trivially imply some form of statistical self-similarity. (Fractal dimension itself is a numerical measure which is preserved across scales.) Random fractals are examples of fractals which are statistically self-similar, but neither exactly nor quasi-self-similar.
In nature
Approximate fractals are easily found in nature. These objects display self-similar structure over an extended, but finite, scale range. Examples include clouds, snow flakes, crystals, mountain ranges, lightning, river networks, cauliflower or broccoli, and systems of blood vessels and pulmonary vessels. Coastlines may be loosely considered fractal in nature.
A fractal fern computed using an Iterated function system
A fractal fern computed using an Iterated function system
Trees and ferns are fractal in nature and can be modeled on a computer by using a recursive algorithm. This recursive nature is obvious in these examples — a branch from a tree or a frond from a fern is a miniature replica of the whole: not identical, but similar in nature.
In 1999, certain self similar fractal shapes were shown to have a property of "frequency invariance" — the same electromagnetic properties no matter what the frequency — from Maxwell's equations (see fractal antenna).[3]
Fractal pentagram drawn with a vector iteration program
Fractal pentagram drawn with a vector iteration program
In creative works
Fractal patterns have been found in the paintings of American artist Jackson Pollock. While Pollock's paintings appear to be composed of chaotic dripping and splattering, computer analysis has found fractal patterns in his work.[4]
Decalcomania, a technique used by artists such as Max Ernst, can produce fractal-like patterns.[5] It involves pressing paint between two surfaces and pulling them apart.
Fractals are also prevalent in African art and architecture. Circular houses appear in circles of circles, rectangular houses in rectangles of rectangles, and so on. Such scaling patterns can also be found in African textiles, sculpture, and even cornrow hairstyles.[6]
Applications
As described above, random fractals can be used to describe many highly irregular real-world objects. Other applications of fractals include:[8]
* Classification of histopathology slides in medicine
* Fractal landscape or Coastline complexity
* Enzyme/enzymology (Michaelis-Menten kinetics)
* Generation of new music
* Generation of various art forms
* Signal and image compression
* Seismology
* Fractal in Soil Mechanics
* Computer and video game design, especially computer graphics for organic environments and as part of procedural generation
* Fractography and fracture mechanics
* Fractal antennas — Small size antennas using fractal shapes
* Small angle scattering theory of fractally rough systems
* Neo-hippies t-shirts and other fashion
* Generation of patterns for camouflage, such as MARPAT
* Digital sundial
* Generation of Price Series
* Fractal democracy
See also
* Bifurcation theory
* Butterfly effect
* Chaos theory
* Complexity
* Constructal theory
* Contraction mapping theorem
* Diamond-square algorithm
* Droste effect
* Feigenbaum function
* Fractal art
* Fractal compression
* Fractal flame
* Fractal landscape
* Fracton
* Graftal
* List of fractals by Hausdorff dimension
* Publications in fractal geometry
* Newton fractal
* Recursion
* Recursionism
* Reentrant
* Sacred geometry
* Self-reference
* Strange loop
* Turbulence
References
1. ^ Mandelbrot, B.B. (1982). The Fractal Geometry of Nature. W.H. Freeman and Company.. ISBN 0-7167-1186-9.
2. ^ Falconer, Kenneth (2003). Fractal Geometry: Mathematical Foundations and Applications. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., xxv. ISBN 0-470-84862-6.
3. ^ Hohlfeld,R., and Cohen, N.,"SELF-SIMILARITY AND THE GEOMETRIC REQUIREMENTS FOR FREQUENCY INDEPENDENCE IN ANTENNAE ", Fractals, Vol. 7, No. 1 (1999) 79-84
4. ^ Richard Taylor, Adam P. Micolich and David Jonas. Fractal Expressionism : Can Science Be Used To Further Our Understanding Of Art?
5. ^ A Panorama of Fractals and Their Uses by Michael Frame and Benoit B. Mandelbrot
6. ^ Ron Eglash. African Fractals: Modern Computing and Indigenous Design. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press 1999.
7. ^ Peng, Gongwen; Decheng Tian (21 July 1990). "The fractal nature of a fracture surface". Journal of Physics A (14): 3257-3261. doi:10.1088/0305-4470/23/14/022. Retrieved on 2007-06-02.
8. ^ Applications. Retrieved on 2007-10-21.
Further reading
* Barnsley, Michael F., and Hawley Rising. Fractals Everywhere. Boston: Academic Press Professional, 1993. ISBN 0-12-079061-0
* Falconer, Kenneth. Techniques in Fractal Geometry. John Willey and Sons, 1997. ISBN 0-471-92287-0
* Jürgens, Hartmut, Heins-Otto Peitgen, and Dietmar Saupe. Chaos and Fractals: New Frontiers of Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1992. ISBN 0-387-97903-4
* Benoît B. Mandelbrot The Fractal Geometry of Nature. New York: W. H. Freeman and Co., 1982. ISBN 0-7167-1186-9
* Peitgen, Heinz-Otto, and Dietmar Saupe, eds. The Science of Fractal Images. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1988. ISBN 0-387-96608-0
* Clifford A. Pickover, ed. Chaos and Fractals: A Computer Graphical Journey - A 10 Year Compilation of Advanced Research. Elsevier, 1998. ISBN 0-444-50002-2
* Jesse Jones, Fractals for the Macintosh, Waite Group Press, Corte Madera, CA, 1993. ISBN 1-878739-46-8.
* Hans Lauwerier, Fractals: Endlessly Repeated Geometrical Figures, Translated by Sophia Gill-Hoffstadt, Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ, 1991. ISBN 0-691-08551-X, cloth. ISBN 0-691-02445-6 paperback. "This book has been written for a wide audience..." Includes sample BASIC programs in an appendix.
* Sprott, Julien Clinton (2003). Chaos and Time-Series Analysis. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-850839-5 and ISBN 978-0-19-850839-7.
* Bernt Wahl, Peter Van Roy, Michael Larsen, and Eric Kampman Exploring Fractals on the Macintosh, Addison Wesley, 1995. ISBN 0-201-62630-6
* Nigel Lesmoir-Gordon. "The Colours of Infinity: The Beauty, The Power and the Sense of Fractals." ISBN 1-904555-05-5 (The book comes with a related DVD of the Arthur C. Clarke documentary introduction to the fractal concept and the Mandelbrot set.
* Gouyet, Jean-François. Physics and Fractal Structures (Foreword by B. Mandelbrot); Masson, 1996. ISBN 2-225-85130-1, and New York: Springer-Verlag, 1996. ISBN 0-387-94153-1. Out-of-print. Available in PDF version at [1].
External links
Wikimedia Commons has media related to:
Fractal
Look up fractal in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.
* Fractals at the Open Directory Project |
Alex99, jaycee, CeltickRanger, eqshannon has marked this note useful
Only registered TrekNature members may rate photo notes. |
|
![Gold Star Critiquer/Gold Note Writer [C: 1911 W: 8 N: 4976]](http://i1.treknature.com/misc/g-n-g.gif)
(16095)![Gold Star Critiquer/Gold Star Workshop Editor/Gold Note Writer [C: 3174 W: 154 N: 4796]](http://i1.treknature.com/misc/g-g-g.gif)
(15481)![Gold Star Critiquer [C: 333 W: 0 N: 0]](http://i1.treknature.com/misc/g-n-n.gif)
(0)