| |||||||||||||||||||||
Denali Wolf![]() | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Critiques [Translate]
- deblink
(1256) - [2007-06-11 20:10]
Hi Christopher,
Well I think the image is impressive. The colours in the Wolf look superb and it blends in well with the vegetation that surrounds it. It is a lovely animal to view.
Cheers,
Debbie
- trinko
(4310) - [2007-06-11 21:59]
focus isn't soft as far as i can see. also 1/500 is a bit slow for a moving animal in my opinion. nice colors and pose. sure looks like a dog to me.
- Debz
(3283) - [2007-06-12 4:24]
Hi Christopher, this wolf was moving fast and you probably had shoot fast to catch him, so I think its not bad at all! In fact I think its wonderful, a beautiful Wolf and there is fine detail and natural colours on the Wolf. Good light also. I have a Canon 70-300 and at 300 over a distance it doesn't do well at all. Anyway I like this shot a lot.
tfs
debz
- vanderschelden
(26640) - [2007-06-12 5:57]
- [+]
Hi Christopher,
Nice action photo; it isn't razor sharp but you can argue the softness suggests 'movement'...
In the recent past Nikon was known for its criteria concerning lenses. If the lens doesn't met the former, the lens wasn't market. I don't know if this policy has been changed. I doubt it?
For this specific lens I don't know whether it is seen as a good lens in the Nikon gamma or not; what we do know of course is that the range between 80 and 400 seems an awful lot.
TFS
Annick
- andTiggerstoo (26)
- [2007-06-12 16:55]
Beautiful shot. I really don't get the impression that it is too soft at all.
- rousettus
(8336) - [2007-06-12 18:08]
Hi Christopher,
wonderful capture. it is natural and nicely composed. focus, POV and colors very nice. Thanks
best wishes
Ahmet
- arfer
(0) - [2007-06-13 23:13]
Hello Christopher
Wow a very good capture of this wolf.The details are sharp and the colours are well saturated.Nicely composed in the frame.Good sense of motion forward from this shot.TFS
Rob
- Evelynn
(12543) - [2007-06-19 19:09]
The face and teeth look pretty sharp to me. The color is beautifully natural. I had the Sigma 80-400 and it was softer than this at the long end. I now have the Canon 100-400 and it is definitely better at 400mm. I sure have seen some wonderful photos taken with your lens. That's a lot of money to spend to be disappointed. I'm jealous of this shot. We just returned from Yellowstone and only saw wolves at a distance. A lot of the photos I've seen of Yellowstone wolves show them to be not nearly as robust as this fellow of yours.
TFS
Evelynn : )
| Calibration Check | |||||||||||||||
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | A | B | C | D | E | F |

