<< Previous Next >>

Gulf fritillary caterpillar (3/6)


Gulf fritillary caterpillar (3/6)
Photo Information
Copyright: Edgar Alejandro Guzman Jurado (alejandroguzman) Gold Star Critiquer/Gold Note Writer [C: 92 W: 0 N: 92] (452)
Genre: Animals
Medium: Color
Date Taken: 2005-11-11
Categories: Insects
Camera: Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ30
Exposure: f/4, 1/450 seconds
Photo Version: Original Version
Theme(s): Caterpillars [view contributor(s)]
Date Submitted: 2005-11-19 3:34
Viewed: 1209
Points: 13
[Note Guidelines] Photographer's Note [Spanish]
Continuing with this series... another caterpillar angle who was cover with pollen, and with a little friend in the background


Hugs,
Alejandro





ABOUT THE INSECT:

Taxonomic Classification

Kingdom: Metazoa ((=Animalia) multicellular animals)
Phylum: Arthropoda (arthropods)
Class: Insecta (true insects)
Order: Lepidoptera (butterflies, moths, and their caterpillars)
Family: Nymphalidae (brushfoots)
Genus: Agraulis
Species: Agraulis vanillae
Common Names: Gulf Fritillary Butterfly

marhowie, scottevers7, dew77, extramundi, Dave has marked this note useful
Only registered TrekNature members may rate photo notes.
Add Critique [Critiquing Guidelines] 
Only registered TrekNature members may write critiques.
Discussions
None
You must be logged in to start a discussion.

Critiques [Translate]

Nice shot Alejandro. You have better exposure here than the last shot. I like the composition and the BG works well. TFS!

Hi Alejandro,
Nice macro shot here. Great job to get nice detail in the head area were he is covered in pollen.

  • Great 
  • dew77 Gold Star Critiquer/Gold Star Workshop Editor/Gold Note Writer [C: 4774 W: 294 N: 4020] (13209)
  • [2005-11-19 9:44]

Hello Alejandro!
Wonderful capture.Vivid colors,details,sharpness and POV are excellent.TFS...:-)

  • Good 
  • RII Gold Star Critiquer/Gold Note Writer [C: 485 W: 0 N: 884] (2812)
  • [2005-11-19 13:09]

Hola Alejandro.
Interesante ejemplar,bonitos colores pero a mi gusto falta de nitidez.
Saludos....RICARDO.

La intencion fue muy buena, y la verdad es que conseguiste una foto curiosa, pero quizas demasiado dificil de ver por la complejidad de la planta y de la oruga.
Aprecio algo de ruido en el fondo (característico de las Lumix), facilmente eliminable con algun filtro tipo Neat Image o similar. Gracias por compartirla.
Recibiste mi mensaje acerca de la imagan de la presentacion?

Hi Alejandro
Another busy day/early morning rush.
Well worth the big green smiley.
Thanks for posting.

  • Great 
  • Dave Gold Star Critiquer/Silver Workshop Editor/Gold Note Writer [C: 525 W: 47 N: 674] (2173)
  • [2005-11-20 5:07]

Alejandro,
The flower appears to be a passionflower Passiflora. These grow where I have migrated, Northcentral Arkansas, but the fruits do not fully mature like my native South Louisiana. We called the fruit "maypops" down in Louisiana, and they were quite a treat. When ripe the exterior is like a wrinkled egg, and the interior is filled with what almost looks like fish eggs. But, they are so delicious. Unfortunately, it has been too long since I have last enjoyed one. Do you have these in Bolivia?

Your pollen covered caterpillar is nicely captured. I have never seen one covered in pollen like this. Interesting!
Thanks for sharing,
Dave

may·pop n. 1. A vine (Passiflora incarnata) of the southeast United States having purple and white flowers, three-lobed leaves, and edible yellow fruit. 2. The fruit of this plant. [Alteration of maycock, from earlier maracock, perhaps of Virginia Algonquian origin.]
definition supplied by the "American Heritage Dictionary"

  •      
  • delfi Silver Star Critiquer/Silver Workshop Editor [C: 30 W: 35 N: 7] (90)
  • [2005-11-27 5:46]

Hola, Como estas ?

This pic is very noisy, Alejandro. You can see a lot of color-dots, especially in the red and the green (RGB, color-noise ?).

Try this (not sure): On your camera there's an ISO-setting which regulates "film"-speed. This adjusts the global sensitivity of the camera for light. Try to select ISO 100 (or auto), for the least sensitivity if possible (broad daylight): this has the least noise. ISO 400 for example means more sensitive to light(clouded, forest). In this case signals are boosted by an amplifier inside the camera, which introduces a lot of noise.

Tip: more light, less noise ! (film or CCD)

It is also possible that you have introduced noise at post-production by boosting brightness-levels too much (as to compensate for an under-exposed picture), although I doubt it: looks quite different.

Another suggestion might be to switch noise reduction to "on" (or auto) on your camera.

Also possible is to change your position so that a little bit more light falls on the subject, or to use a "fill-in" flash, but this might introduce over-exposure (macro), incase your camera does not compensate for the extra light of the flash: in this case try to experiment with manually compensating exposure [AE] +/- ev.

Don't worry, caterpillars aren't that fast ...

Calibration Check
















0123456789ABCDEF