|Hi folks. I've been away from TrekNature for some time,but was a regular poster for over 3 years.
Each time I come back to post something, one thing strikes me. TrekNature hasn't evolved much.
Most of the site works quite well, & its good to see that Adams original design & concept have been maintained. I have often wondered though, why the photo size must be so small, especially in this day of 14 megapixel + cameras ? Most other sites that host photographs are always increasing their size allowance, but TrekNature seems to have decreased theirs. The size limitations mean that we only get to post teeny weeny pictures, not much larger than thumbnails. This is one thing that keeps me from posting again each time I visit.
Many of us have become really good photographers these days, and we have such great images with such a lot of detail to share,it seems they are almost being wasted by being posted so small.
I wonder if admin will ever increase the size allowance? My feeling is that 800 x 600 should be the absolute minimum, although 1024 x 768 is a much more reasonable size.
What do others think ?